What a ‘Science' magazine experiment says about the future of AI in journalism, with Abigail Eisenstadt

<p>1131. This week, we talk with ‘Science' magazine senior writer Abigail Eisenstadt about her team's year-long experiment testing ChatGPT's ability to summarize research papers. We look at their methodology, the limitations they realized, and their main finding: that AI could “transcribe” scientific studies but failed to “translate” them with context. </p><p>Read the report: https://www.science.org/do/10.5555/page.2385668/full/chatgpt_project_report_final.pdf</p><p>🔗 <strong>Share your familect recording in a </strong><a href="https://wa.me/message/LTNZOVFAQJK6B1&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1753892325231019&usg=AOvVaw2Z5GB4pvIMaVbr_E2jmpuS" target="_blank"><strong>WhatsApp chat </strong></a><strong>or at </strong>833-214-4475.</p><p>🔗 <strong>Watch my </strong><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/learning/instructors/mignon-fogarty" target="_blank"><strong>LinkedIn Learning writing courses</strong></a><strong>.</strong></p><p>🔗 <strong>Subscribe to the </strong><a href="https://www.quickandd...